Category Archives: Restoring the Constitution

Why This Former Republican is Voting None of the Above

GOP

I’ve been a lifelong Republican. My first election was 1968. I voted for Nixon. I’ve voted in every election since for the Republican. I held my nose for Bush Read My Lips, for Dole, Mc Cain and Romney. This year I supported Ted Cruz. I’m done. I want to echo what I heard one friend say, “If we vote for Trump we will need to apologize to Bill Clinton.” Why? We said that “character matters”. And none of the candidates has the moral character to lead our nation.

Hillary Clinton is a criminal and a liar. Donald Trump is an unrepentant serial adulterer, strip club and casino owner who lies about half of the time that he opens his mouth. He has switched his position on every major issue of importance to conservatives at least one time. He is a rude, crass bully. Donald Trump is a liberal New York Democrat and he won’t be getting my vote. I’ll be writing in Ted Cruz. It’s not a wasted vote and it’s not a vote for Hillary. If a majority of voters, both Republican and Democrat, rejected both of these candidates, they would not receive sufficient electoral votes to be elected. That would send the most powerful message that the political class has ever heard.

Not only will I be #Noneoftheabove (https://www.facebook.com/groups/1078315025573152/?ref=bookmarks) in my selection of President, but I will do likewise for the Senate and Congressional election. I recently changed my registration to “None.” I won’t be voting for Democrats because they are big government socialists, union tools and immoral on social issues like abortion. But, I won’t be voting for the old Chuckwagon Grassley or for Shaft Rod Blum either.

Let me cite some personal history with Grassley and Blum. In 2008, I wrote and I called Grassley. I begged him not to vote for the Wall St bank bailout. If you’ve seen the movie “The Big Short” you know how the Wall St. banks like Goldman Sachs were responsible for the 2008 financial crisis. I lost $30,000 in my 401k in one day. But, the banks got bailed out. Their irresponsible behavior didn’t cost them a dime. Grassley voted for the bailout. He later repented with crocodile tears, so I gave him another chance in 2010. In 2010 and 2014 the GOP promised to stop Obama’s big government agenda and we gave them complete control of Congress. Not a dime of our taxes can be spent without Congressional approval. But, because the Republicans are afraid of the media and Obama they bent over and rubber stamped everything he wanted.

I watched the Center for Medical Progress videos revealing that Planned Parenthood is selling aborted baby parts. This evil organization should not receive federal money for anything that it does. Earlier this year Senator Ted Cruz had a brilliant plan to defund Planned Parenthood. He was proposing an amendment to the Transportation appropriation. This was a measure that Obama and the Democrats desperately wanted. It would have made it very difficult for Democrats to filibuster the measure of for Obama to veto it. But, Lying Mitch RINO McConnell would not allow the amendment to come to a vote. Cruz only needed ten Senators to suspend the rule and get a vote. I called both Grassley and Ernst and begged them to support Senator Cruz. They did not. Subsequently, with typical political deceitfulness, Ernst offered a stand-alone defund measure that she and everyone else in Congress knew would never have enough votes (60) to pass a Democrat filibuster. She wasn’t fooling me.

Last year Congress gave Obama Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) to negotiate the Trans Pacific Partnership. TPA virtually assures passage of TPP by allowing a simple majority vote on TPP without amendments. TPP is one of those treaties that has been kept secret, but it is reported that it would permit foreign companies to open businesses here and import their own foreign labor. I called Rod Blum and begged him not to support TPA, but Rod Shaft Blum ignored me and gave Obama everything he wanted. Well, it’s pay-back time.

I will write-in Ted Cruz for President, Pastor Cary Gordon for Senator and Steve Sherman for Congress.

Answers to the Most Common Objections to Privatizing Public Education

As I am working to restore the republic by dismantling public education I find many parents and teachers that are furious with our public education system. Most want to simply reform the system. I would caution them that the likelihood of success at reforming the system is small. Reformers have been working at it for half a century without much success. I would liken it to reforming federal spending. It’s too big. We’ve passed the tipping point. There are too many powerful entrenched interests opposing them including big government progressives, big union bosses and giant corporate moguls. They have billions of dollars to spend. I want people to consider a radical solution that could be achieved outside the normal political processes. It involves your choice in the limited time that may be available. I want to address the most common objections I hear to privatization.

“It would be impossible to accomplish.” True, through normal political/ legislative processes. Maybe not as impossible as overturning Common Core! The entire funding system is based upon daily attendance. A sizeable boycott (25%+) would bankrupt many school districts, thus forcing legislative relief which would trigger the debate. A large scale boycott would make enforcement of truancy laws impossible. Social media can be exploited to enable a boycott to go viral. Parents would not have to make immediate alternative plans. You could say that you were home schooling, do it in the evening or work with other parents. A viral boycott could shut the system down within a few months. There would be a transition phase where private alternatives would arise. There would be thousands of teachers seeking employment. There would be empty real estate available for lease at bargain prices.

I hear this objection: “Most people do not or cannot home school and cannot afford private school. What would happen to poor and inner city children?” Federal and state income and sales taxes could be reduced by eliminating education spending. Education spending is the largest budget item in most states. Total taxpayer investment in K-12 education in the United States for the 2004-05 school year is estimated to be $536 billion. Most property taxes could be cut by 60 – 75%. See: http://febp.newamerica.net/background-analysis/school-finance

Source: National Center for Education Statistics

“Federal K-12 education spending—including spending in the Department of Education and other departments—has increased rapidly. Spending jumped from $12.5 billion in 1965 to $72.8 billion in 2008—a more than five-fold increase.”

See more at: http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/education/k-12-education-subsidies#sthash.OJihhsTC.dpuf

As property taxes are reduced, housing expense will be reduced. Even landlords are subject to competition. This would help pay for private education or make it possible for one parent to stay home to home school. The cost/ pupil in private education is less than a public education now. As competition and choice increased, private education costs would likely decline. Private schools and charities could offer scholarships for poor children who are committed to learning. Typically, especially in inner city schools, a number of students disrupt the learning environment because they have no interest in being educated and parents are either absent or disinterested. Too many kids aspire to a life of crime or dependency. Teachers and schools spend a disproportionate amount of time and money attempting to control/ educate these students to the detriment of other students. The success rate with these students is low. Many aspire to a life of crime and that is where many end up anyway. After all of the time and expense a large proportion of these end up incarcerated or on public assistance. In a private school, disruptive students and uncooperative parents would be expelled. We really don’t have much to lose by letting many of these kids go. Perhaps some will wise up through the school of hard knocks.

I hear teachers say that they would suffer pay reductions and many good quality teachers would quit. Teacher pay reductions would probably be temporary. As the number of private schools expanded dramatically, demand for quality teachers would increase proportionally. In a private environment teacher pay would be based more on performance than seniority. Privatization would eliminate much of the dead wood in the teacher corps. Teacher performance would be evaluated more by the teacher’s direct supervisor rather than some nameless bureaucrat and it would not be based upon some bogus standardized test. With reduced class sizes and fewer disruptive students, teachers would be able to focus on teaching. The job experience would be much more enjoyable. With privatization, there would be much more diversity in styles of teaching and curriculum as different schools sought to carve out their own niche. Teachers would have more of a say in developing curriculum and teaching methods. Teaching would be a more rewarding career in more ways than just money. Too many teachers today are burned out because of the system they are forced to work under. 10 years x $100,000. = $1,000,000. 25 years x $75,000. = $1,875,000.

Learn more: https://www.facebook.com/groups/536415279763727/

Tagged , ,

Radical Solution to the Education Problem

Naep College readyRadical Solution to the Education Problem

Perhaps the solution, just as with the Post Office, is to privatize the entire  system. Can you hear the screams from the left? But, think about it. What would  this involve? First of all, this would open up a huge market for private  enterprise. Well organized private companies would have an opportunity to earn a  profit while providing superior service. By introducing choice and competition,  parents and students would be able to spend their money where they can get the  best results.

 

http://www.facebook.com/groups/536415279763727/

 

 

Remember the Alamo

Alamo

I attended a meeting of several hundred evangelical Christian pastors last week. There was practically unanimous concern that our nation is on the brink of utter destruction. Rampant corruption, gross immorality, widespread violence and sexual perversion are but symptoms of a sick society that is described prophetically in Second Timothy chapter 3: “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;” (2Ti 3:1-4) One of the speakers was a pastor from a cowboy church in Texas. He wept as he compared our country to a disobedient horse ignoring God’s call to “whoa!” He feared that we may have already reached a point where the wrath of God would fall upon this land. I shared similar feelings with him, only I compared it to a capsizing sailboat that had already passed the tipping point.

David Barton of Wall Builders, also a Texan, was a speaker at the meeting. Anyone familiar with David knows that he is a treasure trove of American history and the Bible. He provided us some interesting information from researchers such as George Barna. Most importantly, that Americans are biblically illiterate and that the level of illiteracy increases among younger generations. Not surprisingly, Barton pointed out that even though evangelical Christians vote in great numbers, they don’t vote significantly different than the population in general. So, we have “Christians” voting for homosexual marriage and a President who asks God to bless Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider. Much of the blame rests with those in the pulpit. Research was reported that less than 3% of pastors preached a message about homosexual marriage or abortion in the year preceding the election. Our pastors, perhaps more interested in building their church than God’s church, would prefer to preach “seeker sensitive” messages about how we can be happy. So the theme of the meeting was to encourage pastors to “stand up” for biblical truth.

The group also heard from Senators Ted Cruz of Texas and Rand Paul of Kentucky.  They both gave speeches supporting biblical values. While I’m sure that either would make a better President than the current jihadist-in-chief, I’m skeptical that, given the country’s current level of knowledge, either could get elected or that it just might be too late. It occurred to me that these speakers were preaching to the choir. Most of the pastors were well into their fifties or older. I saw very few younger pastors there. Who is going to reach the younger generation? Even if these older pastors do preach biblical truth, will younger people listen? Again, I’m skeptical. Sometimes I think that the only thing that will get the attention of these young folks is cold, cruel reality. That horse may need a case of divine whoop ass in order to get their attention. Perhaps the best that we can do is to pray for mercy and a miracle.

I was struck by the contingent of Texans at this Iowa meeting. Last week, brave Texans battled Satanists to pass the strictest pro-life law in the land. Perhaps, God’s grace will shine on Texas. It just may end up being the last free place on earth. Thinking of all of these Texans at the meeting, my memory was jogged to recall the phrase “Remember the Alamo!” It was a rallying cry for Texans fighting for their freedom to remember the brave men that died in defense of that freedom.

Tagged , ,